Visit Paul William Tenny's column >>

PAUL WILLIAM TENNYHome Page

Freelance screenwriter living in North Carolina
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 276; Links Seeded: 1329
Member Since: 9/2006Last Seen: 11/24/2009

Companies start competing for bailout money

advertisement

The bailout is now the hottest lobbying game in town.� Insurers, automakers and other industries want the Treasury to cut them a piece of the largest government rescue in U.S. history.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.5
2.5
2.3
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
{"commentId":3695152,"authorDomain":"linda7502000"}

I think Both parties in congress had a big hand in the bailout, but as usual we are Divided by parties (dems & repubs) so we are Falling. The only way we can accomplish anything is to Unite as American people and tell them all what we want done...... and Now

{"commentId":3695152,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"linda7502000"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#26 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:10 PM EDT
{"commentId":3695156,"authorDomain":"congleton"}

My wife and

My wife and I own a plant nursery.You can guess what kind of shap we are in.When money is tight we are the first to suffer. Our business is bairly holding on as are others in our industry. Bailing out the banks is not going to solve the problem. The small consumer has to have money to spend to fix the economy. My idea is to take that bailout money and give a debt credit to middle class America to pay off some of their debt. This way the banks will get money .The little guy will be relived of some of his debt and the system will start working again. What good does it do to get the credit markets working again if the consumer can't afford to borrow.

I

{"commentId":3695156,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"congleton"}
    Reply#27 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:10 PM EDT
    {"commentId":3695220,"authorDomain":"ynotmike"}

    Bush already brought back a brigade for civil unrest and thats 5000 guns and people to use them.

    This is double dipping when the Insurance companies need money and be paid from we who have to use them.

    I say let them all sink into welfare and then come and see us for a good spit on. either Bush is crazy??????????????????????????????????????????? or we are? just getting tired of being an american from this little punk boy who can't even eat a pretzel without choking on it and his little friend Cheney.

    No bail out now as they are bidding on who needs what and we are the ones hurting.

    {"commentId":3695220,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"ynotmike"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#28 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:15 PM EDT
    {"commentId":3695295,"authorDomain":"westerngents"}

    no more bailouts "period"!!!!!!!

    {"commentId":3695295,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"westerngents"}
      Reply#29 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:23 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3695358,"authorDomain":"redtbird"}

      Eric--

      I agree, but gee--we keep saying "NO" in larger and larger numbers, and they keep adding to their pie....any other ideas? Before my Irish temper gets the best of me.....?

      {"commentId":3695358,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"redtbird"}
        #29.1 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:27 PM EDT
        {"commentId":3695774,"authorDomain":"westerngents"}

        Why not do a million TAXPAYER march on Washington or our state capitols..The Mexican ILLEGALS did it why can't we???

        {"commentId":3695774,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"westerngents"}
          #29.2 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:02 PM EDT
          {"commentId":3696811,"authorDomain":"redtbird"}

          Excellent point..........

          {"commentId":3696811,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"redtbird"}
            #29.3 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:53 PM EDT
            {"commentId":3702760,"authorDomain":"widemoto"}

            How about a Tax Return Tea Party? A mass delay or even a no filing of tax returns for those expecting to owe taxes. It might be an interesting protest but it will have to be overwheming enough make it a nearly impossible task for the IRS to handle.

            It could send a strong message that we don't want any more bailouts period. It's a risky move but so was the Boston Tea Party.

            {"commentId":3702760,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"widemoto"}
            • 1 vote
            #29.4 - Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:47 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3708812,"authorDomain":"monger-1"}

            How about trying something that worked about 200 years ago - a tax revolt ?

            Votem them all out in November & don't file in April.

            PS: 24 Oct 08 - PNC will pay $5.58 billion in stock and cash for National City and get $7.7 billion through the government's bailout plan. Secretary Paulson, if we still want to file, can we taxpayers claim a $2.1 billion loss on this "investment"? Should more than offset my salary.. 

            {"commentId":3708812,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"monger-1"}
            • 1 vote
            #29.5 - Sun Oct 26, 2008 8:28 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":3695343,"authorDomain":"keithnvalorie"}

            R Crockett, you are such a "CROC", Obama has never said anything of the sort. Where were you and all of the extemist gun idiots when it came to protecting your rights to privacy with that "CROC" of legislation called the Patriot Act. Would one who so strongly defends the right to bare arms also be as concerned about their privacy rights? Your so full of S--- and i am so happy people are finally seeing through this crap. Go put your white pointy hood back on, at least then were only subject to how stupid you sound.

            {"commentId":3695343,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"keithnvalorie"}
              Reply#30 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:26 PM EDT
              {"commentId":3696244,"authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}

              no blind patriot---your comments seem to indicate that you are BLIND! and probably an extreme leftist liberal who would like to live in Cuba.  Obviously you have little if any knowledge about the details of the Patriots Act or you are of a kind that has something to cover up and hide. Honest, clean living Americans do not have one thing to fear as any information obtained has very tight limitations as to availability to anyone including governments.  Most people give out more of their personal information over the internet and through purchases at stores etc. than is taken by those required to obtain information by those companies covered by the Act.

              {"commentId":3696244,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}
                #30.1 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:51 PM EDT
                {"commentId":3696542,"authorDomain":"pwtenny"}
                Obviously you have little if any knowledge about the details of the Patriots Act or you are of a kind that has something to cover up and hide.

                It's the Patriot Act, not Patriots, and that fallacy is noting but an excuse to destroy peoples privacy. "If you have nothing to hide", good grief, what ever happened to the notion of privacy and liberty in this country? You conservatives wear patriotism like a badge and yet are always the first in line to sell our freedom and liberty for a pat on the head.

                If you have nothing to hide buddy, let me see your tax returns.
                If you have nothing to hide, let me see your phone records.
                If you have nothing to hide, let me watch you have sex with your wife to make sure you aren't sodomizing her which until Lawrence v. Texas was illegal in many states.
                If you have nothing to hide, let me read your email.
                If you have nothing to hide, pretty soon you'll have nothing left at all.

                This is our country, if you don't like us fighting for our rights, maybe you conservatives are the ones that need to leave.

                {"commentId":3696542,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"pwtenny"}
                • 4 votes
                #30.2 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:23 PM EDT
                {"commentId":3697525,"authorDomain":"amsujo"}

                no blind patriot,

                So you don't think Obama would take guns away from citizens? Well check out his bill S2433 The Global Poverty Act. In his bill it states that the US would strictly adhere to the United Nations Millennium Declaration. The UN's Millennium Declaration states that each signee nation will disarm its public. Obama knows what is in that document and is going to try an end around to disarm the public. You better wake up!!!! 

                {"commentId":3697525,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"amsujo"}
                • 1 vote
                #30.3 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:08 PM EDT
                {"commentId":3702822,"authorDomain":"wilberta"}

                Rockachaw 67

                Explain how the Hell Obama is going to take away every ones GUNS. That would require a

                CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT by CONGRESS..Please Google the requisites of the EXECUTIVE and

                LEGISLATIVE Branches of our Government. On the contrary ignorance is not BLISS

                {"commentId":3702822,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"wilberta"}
                • 1 vote
                #30.4 - Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:53 AM EDT
                {"commentId":3704881,"authorDomain":"JWWSU"}

                Rockachaw 67

                Who the hell pays any attention to the UN? They are the biggest, toothless joke on the planet. The Global Poverty Act!! Big deal! I'm about as scared of the UN as I am of my grandmother. 

                {"commentId":3704881,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"JWWSU"}
                  #30.5 - Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:01 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":3695556,"authorDomain":"usnr600"}

                  It looks like the next president won't have to worry about what to do with the 700 billion. At the rate their going there won't be any left when he gets in office.

                  {"commentId":3695556,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"usnr600"}
                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#31 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:43 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":3695595,"authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}

                  Notice Paulson is leaving with Bush??  So all the rats are going to jump ship together after the money is gone.

                  {"commentId":3695595,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}
                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#32 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:46 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":3695786,"authorDomain":"westerngents"}

                  Pelosi and Bernanke will still be around to take their places..

                  {"commentId":3695786,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"westerngents"}
                    #32.1 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:03 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":3695888,"authorDomain":"leonardcharles"}

                    Soon the middle class is going to go under

                    I think we already did....

                    {"commentId":3695888,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"leonardcharles"}
                    • 4 votes
                    Reply#33 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:14 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":3695929,"authorDomain":"westerngents"}

                    Let's form THE LEGAL AMERICAN TAXPAYERS CORP. and claim this Bailout for ourselves!!!!

                    {"commentId":3695929,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"westerngents"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#34 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:18 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":3696060,"authorDomain":"brodsusan"}

                    I own a small business that's going to go under without help until the economy turns around.  Where do I apply for bailout money for my company? 

                    {"commentId":3696060,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"brodsusan"}
                      Reply#35 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:32 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":3696099,"authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}

                      If your local community bank can't or doesn't help you, you like that community bank do not have access tothe funds and you too are screwed.  You needed to invest in subprime home loans to qualify.

                      {"commentId":3696099,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}
                        #35.1 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:35 PM EDT
                        Reply
                        {"commentId":3696070,"authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}

                        Now the foreigners are going to get into the banking business in the U.S.  The 700 billion is to bail out the Investment Banks that pay the huge salaries and big bonuses and they continue to use their bail out money to do the same. At the same time, the community banks do not seem to be getting much if anything yet these smaller banks, operating in small town america that make loans to grow crops, feed cattle, for mom and pop businesses to help their local communities are not given opportunity for the funds.  The crooks get more and the honest bankers get screwed.

                        {"commentId":3696070,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}
                          Reply#36 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:33 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":3697731,"authorDomain":"citizengomezusa1"}

                          Sorry to make you aware that the foreign bankers are already here, and Paulson is taking very good care of them.

                          Bank Bailout Atrocity Was Passed by Fraud! When the Congress, including both major Presidential candidates, told their constituents that the bailout was necessary, they didn't mention that among the major institutions lining up to be bailed out are foreign interest. British, Dutch, and Spanish banks are all lining up to demand hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. taxpayers.They lied, and when the average citizen confronts his Representative on this fraud, the politician will just say, "We lied. They told us we had to do it, and we lied." The bailout swindle represents a "fascist coup" against the U.S. Constitution, giving totalitarian powers to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson for bailing out his friends at Goldman Sachs and other international foreign interested thieves in the financial system. The bailout was designed to only save specifically important U.S. banks that are owned by foreign interests and includes the domestic arms of British and other foreign banks (e.g., the U.S. banks owned by HSBC and the Royal Bank of Scotland). Remember the fascist economic plan always includes their GENOCIDE, apartheid, and many other crimes against humanity.

                          Citations: Oct. 14, 2008 (LPAC)--U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Fed Chairman `Helicopter Ben' Bernanke announced at 8:45 this morning that they were adopting the latest British-driven "European" bailout plan, pumping $250 billion immediately into the stocks of U.S. banks, while the Fed pumps trillions into the global banks in short-term loans.

                          {"commentId":3697731,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"citizengomezusa1"}
                            #36.1 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:29 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":3696089,"authorDomain":"ddstern2"}

                            Big guys first - little guys never -the american way!

                            {"commentId":3696089,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"ddstern2"}
                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#37 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:35 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":3696171,"authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}

                            This issue is not a Bush issue or just Republican created.  It took the vote of representatives and senators of both parties to pass the Graham/leach/blyley act which killed the fire wall between Investment and Commercial Banking.  Community banks opposed the bill but the crooks in Washington get their money from the biggies who fund them and the theiving lobbyists. Lobbying should be outlawed period. And the amount of funds given towards anyones run for an office should be limited to the area, district, state etc. that is eligible to vote for them.  Union and corporate contributions of any amount should be illegal. To blame any one person or political party for this fiasco is not reasonable.

                            {"commentId":3696171,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}
                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#38 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:42 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":3696200,"authorDomain":"ladacha"}

                            Hey, the bailout should include our college grads who have thousands of dollars in student loans.  Their loans should be paid off by this program.

                            {"commentId":3696200,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"ladacha"}
                              Reply#39 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:46 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":3696299,"authorDomain":"gleggkcm"}
                              Keith GleggDeleted
                              {"commentId":3696549,"authorDomain":"sberto"}

                              Yep!  Let's all line up for corporate welfare!   Sounds like "socialization" to me and perhaps some "re-distribution of the wealth"!!!!   WOW, where are the republicans when you need them  to spew their poison on the corporate world?

                              {"commentId":3696549,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"sberto"}
                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#41 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:24 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":3696567,"authorDomain":"sberto"}

                              Susan-300440....apply at the ballot box in November.

                              {"commentId":3696567,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"sberto"}
                                Reply#42 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:26 PM EDT
                                {"commentId":3696614,"authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}

                                I doubt that there will be much change regardless of who becomes pres.  The house, senate and bureaucrats are still there.

                                {"commentId":3696614,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"akre-peanut"}
                                  #42.1 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:32 PM EDT
                                  Reply
                                  {"commentId":3696642,"authorDomain":"sberto"}

                                  R.Crockett...you're full of it!   The only statement Obama made about guns is that we can't have people walking down the streets with AK-47s.  Democrats won't outlaw guns any more than Republicans will stop catering to the elite.  It takes a pretty low mentality to believe what you're saying.  If you're only concern is keeping your guns and that's what you'll base your vote on then I feel sorry for you!

                                  {"commentId":3696642,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"sberto"}
                                  • 3 votes
                                  Reply#43 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:35 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":3697607,"authorDomain":"amsujo"}

                                  "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government "

                                       Thomas Jefferson         

                                  {"commentId":3697607,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"amsujo"}
                                  • 3 votes
                                  #43.1 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:16 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":3697634,"authorDomain":"amsujo"}

                                  Maybe if more people listened to our Founding Fathers and voted accordingly, we wouldn't be in the mess we are in presently. But, the sheeple are easily lead and are totally appathetic.

                                  SteveB, maybe you should go back and read your history!!!!!

                                  {"commentId":3697634,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"amsujo"}
                                  • 1 vote
                                  #43.2 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:19 PM EDT
                                  Reply
                                  {"commentId":3697280,"authorDomain":"eddiecarlock1967"}

                                  I think AIG should not get another dime . I think if a company gets any of the bailout money the top ten CEOs of the company should be fired no bonuses they did not deserve them if they were doing their jobs and doing them right they would not have been in the shape they are in now.

                                  {"commentId":3697280,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"eddiecarlock1967"}
                                    Reply#44 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:44 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":3703824,"authorDomain":"dd50"}

                                    Don't worry, there is a new CEO at AIG, and she will be dismantling it and selling off its parts shortly.

                                    {"commentId":3703824,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"dd50"}
                                      #44.1 - Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:20 PM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":3697603,"authorDomain":"JoJoe"}

                                      Washington will never change until we have #1 term limits.

                                      #2 do away with lobbyist and have our representatives actually ask the people for their opinion and then vote as the population wishes on every issue.

                                      {"commentId":3697603,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"JoJoe"}
                                        Reply#45 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:16 PM EDT
                                        {"commentId":3697646,"authorDomain":"amsujo"}

                                        JoJo,

                                        That's a good start!!!!

                                        {"commentId":3697646,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"amsujo"}
                                          #45.1 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:20 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":3701713,"authorDomain":"canemah35"}

                                          jojo, on the surface, term limits seem great.  In reality, the politicos would just go through their terms with the attitude of "screw the voters, I can't be re-elected anyway so why should I care.  I'll get my retirement now no matter what."  Yeah, like now is the time to pad my nest for after my short political career.  I am however, in favor of outlawing lobbying.  There is only one special interest group in this country authorized by the US Constitution.  The American citizens.

                                          {"commentId":3701713,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"canemah35"}
                                            #45.2 - Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:05 AM EDT
                                            {"commentId":3704912,"authorDomain":"JWWSU"}

                                            jojo

                                            And public financing of elections with NO outside money or anything else of value allowed. We might even outlaw lobbying since it subverts the system.

                                            {"commentId":3704912,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"JWWSU"}
                                              #45.3 - Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:03 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":3724411,"authorDomain":"monger-1"}

                                              We control term limits, with our votes!

                                              Stop being a softie, and VOTE THEM ALL OUT.

                                              Yes, some decent politocos may fall by the wayside, but tough love is what these times call for. Let them run again next time, a bit humbled.

                                              {"commentId":3724411,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"monger-1"}
                                                #45.4 - Mon Oct 27, 2008 5:47 PM EDT
                                                Reply
                                                {"commentId":3697785,"authorDomain":"tukdave"}

                                                I am just "SICK AS HELL" over this bail-out crap! I do indeed wish that "EVERY SINGLE FAMILY" that is facing foreclosure would stand up against them and tell them "The Banks Etc..." to go to hell.

                                                What ar they (The Government) going to do about it if we do ?  Don't tell me: They will probably make Saddam Huesien look like an angel compared to their hitler style "LAW & ORDER"....

                                                When you can bail out corporations that literally "set the people up to fail in order to make profit" and then leave the innocent to suffer you may as well call yourselve the devil. So is it the "White House" (Our Government) and or is it the Devils House... Lets paint it red and get creative people...  

                                                Amen !!!    Son's of a @!$%#es better stay clear of me and my family! I despise the government of USA any more !!!

                                                {"commentId":3697785,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"tukdave"}
                                                • 1 vote
                                                Reply#46 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:34 PM EDT
                                                {"commentId":3697806,"authorDomain":"tukdave"}

                                                Devil's Advocates.... thats who those damn republicans are !!!

                                                {"commentId":3697806,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"tukdave"}
                                                  Reply#47 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:35 PM EDT
                                                  {"commentId":3697866,"authorDomain":"askari-ali"}

                                                  OK folks, we are really going to have to work hard if we expect things to change.  Currently, we live in a kleptocracy that was an oligarchy previously.  If you don't know what those terms mean, please look them up.

                                                  Though it's good to see people fired up enough to talk about getting our current congress out of office through voting, I seriously doubt that will be a solution to our problems.  Democrats and Republicans are merely two sides of the same coin.  They are ALL POLITICIANS and by definition are performing their functions quite well -- scheming and maneuvering to gain leverage and power.  You can write, call and protest against congress all you like but there are no laws or provisions in the constitution that give the citizenry power to remove them from office.  Only congress itself can remove one or more members from its bodies.

                                                  As far as the global economic crisis, it was pre-meditated.  I defy anyone to make ANY sense out of the concept of Credit Default Swaps which lies at the center of this financial meltdown.  Companies bought bad debts from other companies and credit agencies gave these debts AAA credit ratings so that insurance companies would insure these debts for the companies who bought them.  Unfortunately, the whole world got greedy and bought into this ridiculous get-rich-quick-scheme as well.  In my estimation, if someone has not only bought my bad debt but made money off of it as well, then why isn't my individual credit report cleared of the debt?  The reason is that buying these bad debts never required any of the companies to surrender hard assets.  This is all an electronic moving of finances without actual assets being in danger...until the other countries who our government borrowed money from and/or had invest in these bad debts wondered when the bad debts would become good.  Foolish thinking but that's what greed will do to normally rational people.

                                                  Since our government nor anyone else will be able to untangle the toxic debt and see what amount of assets are wrapped up in this fiasco, why not wipe everyone's slate clean?  They can't because the Federal Reserve is in charge of issuing credit to our country thanks to Woodrow Wilson in 1913.  There is so much collusion in this nightmare and no charges will be brought against those responsible because there are too many guilty parties in high, powerful places and congress' pockets would be getting a hell of a lot lighter in the process, which they will not let happen.

                                                  I ask all of you, what are we going to do as citizens, constituents and taxpayers to turn our country around?  These are scary times but we must be courageous and dare to develop more evolved societal constructs that are just and balanced.

                                                  {"commentId":3697866,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"askari-ali"}
                                                    Reply#48 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:41 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":3698025,"authorDomain":"citizengomezusa1"}

                                                    In regard to your notation: The Credit Default Swaps were created as a further abuse of leverage of the deadly derivaties which are the real primary factor in the international financial collapse of the bankrupt British-Anglo-Dutch financial system. For detail on the CDS I include, (below citation Source) partial exerpt of October 17, 2008 issue of Executive Intelligence Review. Shut Down the Derivatives Markets To Save Civilization by John Hoefle

                                                    Deadly Derivatives The chief financial factor in this carnage is the world's largest casino, the derivatives market. The derivatives market is far larger than the world's stock and bond markets combined, with bets in the quadrillions of dollars compared to the trillions of stocks and bonds. While it is impossible to put an exact number to the size of the overall derivatives market, given its unregulated operations and the way most derivatives deals are privately negotiated, it is possible to put a number to the value of the derivatives bets outstanding, and that number is zero.

                                                    Derivatives were the great financial innovation of the Greenspan era, a form of sleight of hand designed to hide the bankruptcy of the financial system after the stock market crash of 1987, the collapse of the savings and loan sector, the bankruptcy of the banking system as a whole, and the collapse of the junk-bond bubble. The derivatives market was a fraud from its inception, a virtual market where the big banks and other speculators could bet on the movements of currencies, bonds, stocks, and the indices associated with them. Because the derivatives did not require the ownership of the instruments upon which they were nominally based, the level of bets soon outstripped the levels of the underlying instruments, with, for example, far more derivatives bets on bonds than there were actual bonds.

                                                    The derivatives market also employed high degrees of leverage, placing bets with borrowed money. Using leverage, the speculators could place far larger bets than they could, were they limited to their own money. This leverage was highly profitable—at least virtually—as long as the game was expanding, but turned deadly when the music stopped. Then, reverse leverage set in, and the players began losing not only their bets, but the money they borrowed to place those bets. This reverse leverage made it possible for the gamblers to lose multiples of the money they put in, before the loans.

                                                    Another innovation that was highly "profitable" before it blew up, was the market for credit derivatives (a.k.a., credit default swaps, or CDS), a form of insurance policy for bonds and derivatives bets. While the derivatives market was in full swing, banks, insurance companies, and other financial firms sold trillions of dollars of credit derivatives to guarantee the value of a wide range of securities. The credit derivatives were a fig leaf, a necessary part of the derivatives scam. The derivatives sellers, for example, routinely created triple-A rated mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations out of pools of subprime debt, and through the use of credit derivatives, were able to sell such triple-A rated junk to pension funds and other buyers who had a fiduciary obligation to buy only high-quality securities. Without the fig leaf of credit derivatives, this scam would not have been possible, nor would all the losses which followed.

                                                    The obvious point is that, in any widespread securities crisis, the credit derivatives sellers would never be able to cover the insurance they wrote. AIG, for example, wrote hundreds of billions of dollars of credit derivatives, including a substantial amount based upon securities issued by Lehman Brothers. When Lehman failed, so did AIG, which has now received some $120 billion in emergency loans from the Fed.

                                                    The settlement date for credit derivatives written on Lehman securities was Oct. 10, at which point the Lehman securities were valued, optimistically, at just 8.6¢ per dollar of face value. This will be the largest payout ever for the credit derivatives market, assuming the sellers [protection-writers] can afford the payments.

                                                    Shut It Down

                                                    The attempt to save the fictitious "values" and "profits" of the derivatives market is one of the prime drivers of the largest bailout attempt in history. We stress attempt, because the bailout is not working, and can not work—there isn't enough money in the world to cover all these funny-money bets, and the efforts by the central banks to print that money, are fuelling a hyperinflationary bomb which will wipe out not only the remnants of the financial system, but also the governments, national economies, and the means of existence for most of the world's population.

                                                    It is therefore essential that the bailout of the derivatives bubble be stopped, immediately. All derivatives trades should be declared null and void, and wiped off the books of the speculators. Any financial instrument containing a derivative should also be declared null and void, and wiped off the books. This unregulated, insanely leveraged casino should be shut down, and all claims arising from derivatives bets nullified, as if the bets had never occurred.

                                                    There can be no compromise on this. Shut it down, and shut it down now. Your life, and that of the nation, depend upon it.

                                                    {"commentId":3698025,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"citizengomezusa1"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #48.1 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:55 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":3700225,"authorDomain":"stevevigneron"}

                                                    daretobeyourself- This derivative worm has been eating its way into intangible asset value (to my knowledge) from at least the early '90's.  BT and I parted company over the pricing of a derivative/annuity they were trying to sell (fortunately, it was "undersubscribed" and avoided public ownership). If you had a worm in your IT system you have probably already lost any value, right? Your solution will bring us to an end without strangulation by inflation.  I like it. You have given a precise explanation of a major complex disaster and provided a solution other than the voting booth. SHUT IT DOWN  

                                                    {"commentId":3700225,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"stevevigneron"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #48.2 - Sun Oct 26, 2008 4:20 AM EDT
                                                    Reply
                                                    {"commentId":3697875,"authorDomain":"citizengomezusa1"}

                                                    What Paulson is doing is consolidating the power of the fascist financiers!  The below cited article reviews this fascist process as it happened previously in history and as that fascist model is manifesting in the unfolding bailout swindles!

                                                    Panicked Flight Into Corporatism As System Breaks Down

                                                    Oct. 21, 2008 (EIRNS)—This release was issued today by the Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee (LPAC).

                                                    As the global financial system breaks apart, the bankers, their regulators and the governments are also breaking down, psychologically, and lashing out with statements and actions which have no substance, Lyndon LaRouche warned today. Unable to come to grips with reality, they are rushing headlong down the path of Weimar Germany-style hyperinflation and Mussolini-style corporatist fascism.

                                                    The dominant themes from this dysfunctional crowd of bozos are escalating bailouts and global financial dictatorship, as they push ever crazier schemes in a desperate effort to save what cannot be saved. What they will get is not success, but deadly hyperinflation, and the collapse into a dark age, a process which has already begun.

                                                    Typical of this insanity is the Fed's latest "bailout of the day" scheme announced today, to pump some $540 billion into the money-market mutual funds via a new Money Market Investor Funding Facility, or MMIFF, which will lend the funds to five private special purpose vehicles, or PSPVs, to be managed by J.P. Morgan Chase. These PSPVs, which will also raise funds by selling asset-backed commercial paper, will act as a secondary market to buy assets from money market mutual funds and other money-market players. Less than a month ago, on Sept. 29, the U.S. Treasury announced a Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds, with funds provided via the $50 billion Exchange Stabilization Fund; today's action creates a fund more than ten times larger, reflecting the speed with which the system is disintegrating. Some $500 billion has been withdrawn from money market funds since August.

                                                    "Isn't this hyperinflation?" Lyndon LaRouche asked. "This is actually Weimar Germany-style hyperinflation."

                                                    Meanwhile, most of the Fed money being pumped into the financial system is going not to additional lending, but to build up war-chests for takeovers and to cover known but as yet unreported losses. The big banks are planning to take over the smaller banks in droves, using taxpayer money to fund a dangerous concentration of the banking system into a small number of giant banks. Today's New York Times quotes an unnamed Treasury official as explicitly admitting that "Treasury doesn't want to prop up weak banks. One purpose of this plan is to drive consolidation."

                                                    Of the $125 billion to be provided to the top banks in the first round of equity injections, $5 billion is going to help fund Wells Fargo's acquisition of Wachovia and Bank of America is getting $5 billion to aid its takeover of Merrill Lynch. All of this conveniently overlooks the fact that the biggest banks are the most bankrupt of all, and yet the smaller banks will be fed to them, in a desperate attempt to save the zombie giants.

                                                    "You're talking about corporatism," LaRouche responded, "and we should call it that. This is Mussolini; this is fascism. It's what is called corporatism; this is fascism."

                                                    At the same time the controllers of the Anglo-Dutch Liberal system are pushing for a system of global banking regulation, to replace national control. There is discussion of using the IMF for this purpose, but in this case the devil is not in the details, but in the intent, which is to create a global bankers' dictatorship run by the forces which control the British Empire, with the intent of destroying the nation-state system, including the United States.

                                                    "But what happens if China, India and Russia and some others don't join?" LaRouche asked. "I can almost guarantee that would be the case," he added.

                                                    "We're seeing a breakdown of the system which is now a psychological breakdown," LaRouche summed it up." A lack of confidence, lashing out with wild meaningless desperation, with no substance addressing the actual situation.

                                                    "These idiots are in a panicked flight forward, with no idea what they're doing, no coherence, and are turning toward corporatism," LaRouche warned. "This is corporatism, Mussolini-style fascism, and the government is funding it. People should study the history of Mussolini, how his corporatist system was created and how it functioned."

                                                    "What are they going to do? Is the Mussolini government going to control Obama by doses of castor oil?" he asked

                                                    {"commentId":3697875,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"citizengomezusa1"}
                                                      Reply#49 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:42 PM EDT
                                                      {"commentId":3698064,"authorDomain":"fletchmenow"}

                                                      I don't ever want to hear another rich fat cat talk about the poor and welfare, because it is these fat cats on wall street and in banking that have added a new dimension and meaning to the welfare system and they are no better than the poorest among us because we're paying for their caviar, penthouses, Roman holidays, and hoggish ways....and that is the longest run-on sentence I have ever constructed.

                                                      {"commentId":3698064,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"fletchmenow"}
                                                        Reply#50 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:58 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":3698092,"authorDomain":"pfritts"}

                                                        The pirahnna have scented blood and are boiling the waters looking for their share.....

                                                        {"commentId":3698092,"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621","authorDomain":"pfritts"}
                                                          Reply#51 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:01 PM EDT
                                                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                                                          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"399187","isPrivate":false}
                                                          Leave a Comment:
                                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                          {"threadId":"399187","contentId":"2039621"}
                                                          Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                          Stop TrackingStop Tracking