Visit Paul William Tenny's column >>

PAUL WILLIAM TENNYHome Page

Freelance screenwriter living in North Carolina
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 276; Links Seeded: 1329
Member Since: 9/2006Last Seen: 11/24/2009

Ariz. Gov. Napolitano is pick for DHS

advertisement

Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano (D), whose handling of immigration issues brought her accolades from fellow governors, is President-elect Barack Obama's choice to serve as secretary of homeland security, Democratic sources said late Wednesday.

Welcome everyone, you are now in the comment area of Newsvine, a social news website owned by MSNBC used for public discussion of their stories. Please observe the following rules while you are here so that everyone can enjoy themselves:

1. Please do not post your comments in all-bold or italics.
2. Please stay on topic. The topic for this comment area is: "Obama's choice for DHS head"
3. Please do not "personally attack" or otherwise defame other commenters.
4. Please keep swearing to a minimum.
5. Please do not post racist, sexist, bigoted, or other intolerant messages.

Any messages that do not conform to these rules can and will be deleted, in accordance with the Newsvine Code of Honor (user policy). If you have any questions or would like to report an offensive comment, you may contact me here.

Thanks for your understanding.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
15
5.5
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
{"commentId":4135563,"authorDomain":"pwtenny"}

This is going to be a monumental improvement.

{"commentId":4135563,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"pwtenny"}
  • 10 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:47 AM EST
{"commentId":4135757,"authorDomain":"stewag48"}

She's a lawyer, how could that be an improvement, especially someone willing to represent a fraud like Anita Hill. And please enforce Honor Code rules 3 & 5....................................fairly.

{"commentId":4135757,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"stewag48"}
  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:45 AM EST
{"commentId":4135801,"authorDomain":"pwtenny"}

She has a brain. Anyone that has a brain is an immediate improvement over a Bush appointee.

{"commentId":4135801,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"pwtenny"}
  • 15 votes
#1.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:03 AM EST
{"commentId":4135830,"authorDomain":"stewag48"}

Jeffrey Dahmer had a brain too.........your response is going to help me decide if this is going to be a serious conversation. 

{"commentId":4135830,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"stewag48"}
  • 6 votes
#1.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:14 AM EST
{"commentId":4136255,"authorDomain":"rmahan250"}

Vesey,

  I doubt you or anyone else will every know the total truth about the Anita Hill story.  As far as her being a lawyer that has almost become a must to be in politics.  Every word you say will be attacked by those that live to create problems as opposed to work for a solution. Do you know anyone like that?   As far as your Jeffrey Dahmer comment I won't even comment on that.  I am willing to give her a chance. 

{"commentId":4136255,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"rmahan250"}
  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:13 AM EST
{"commentId":4136308,"authorDomain":"StormAZ"}

Rats! I live in Arizona, and we need Janet. Good for her, and an excellent choice by Obama, but it's going to be pretty bad here at home.

{"commentId":4136308,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"StormAZ"}
  • 6 votes
#1.5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:26 AM EST
{"commentId":4136558,"authorDomain":"usnr600"}

This would be a good thing for Arizona, we ould be rid of of her and her big spending ideas. Send her to DC.

{"commentId":4136558,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"usnr600"}
  • 3 votes
#1.6 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:11 AM EST
{"commentId":4136734,"authorDomain":"parthur169"}

Excellent selection! Maybe we will get a rationale immigration policy from Obama as well.

Vesey, You have an opinion, but no proof Anita Hill was a fraud.

{"commentId":4136734,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"parthur169"}
  • 4 votes
#1.7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:33 AM EST
{"commentId":4137031,"authorDomain":"linda-f"}

Anita Hill a fraud?????? I watched the hearings and there was nothing that indicated that she was a fraud.  Who in the world would put themselves through an embarrassing public (televised continuously) situation if the sexaul harrassement was untrue?  Only a man could think this way and make that kind of a statement.  This is exactly the reason so many woman who are sexually harrassed in the workplace don't come forward and make the complaint! 

Napolitano is an excellent choice! 

{"commentId":4137031,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"linda-f"}
  • 5 votes
#1.8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:05 AM EST
{"commentId":4138756,"authorDomain":"garrett-zucker"}

She is a disaster! I live in Arizona and have been witness to her policies that essentially turn our nation's border into swiss cheese. From her issuing driver's licenses to illegal aliens to coming down hard on official who try to enforce illegal imigration laws, she shows no care for protecting the souverenty (sp?) of this nation. She has bent laws here in Arizona just to pacify certain voting blocs and has made threats to her opponents who tried to remind her of those laws. I can't stand Napolitano and I think that her being in that post would mean easier access for those who mean to do us harm.

{"commentId":4138756,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"garrett-zucker"}
  • 5 votes
#1.9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:22 AM EST
{"commentId":4139688,"authorDomain":"silvergoldsmith1"}

The officials agreed to discuss the situation only on grounds of anonymity because of the private nature of the screening process for Obama's Cabinet. Napolitano, who once was Arizona's attorney general, was among the first of the Democratic governors to commit him. <-- Arizona is the gateway for millions of Illegal Aliens to the rest of America. She has proven to not care about national security already. Obama* is just filling seats to repay favors and doing what he was paid for during the election. another brainfart by obama*.

{"commentId":4139688,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"silvergoldsmith1"}
  • 4 votes
#1.10 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:28 PM EST
{"commentId":4142774,"authorDomain":"pro2god"}

I also live in Arizona -- she failed miserably at accomlishing much of anything here for tightening security.  All she has been able to accomplish is to blame everyone in the federal government for all the woes of this state.

Terrible choice, but not very surprising!

{"commentId":4142774,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"pro2god"}
  • 2 votes
#1.11 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:23 PM EST
{"commentId":4143478,"authorDomain":"mrplambert"}

I'll give it to Nap... She is hard working and smart....

BUT, I feel someone from the armed forces should have been appointed this post.

She is not qualified for this post and not hard enough on illegal immigration issues. Voted for Obama, but very disappointed with this choice.

Sheriff Joe Arppaio would have been a better choice.

I say, put up a 50 foot wall and let them find a 51 foot ladder! It's just too damn easy to get in here, especially from Arizona.

{"commentId":4143478,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"mrplambert"}
  • 4 votes
#1.12 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:03 PM EST
{"commentId":4143794,"authorDomain":"mlittlejohn1"}

Tenney--How the bloody hell do you know she has a brain?  And how do you know she will be an improvement?  You don't in fact, and your attempts to justify your confidence in her shows me that you don't even know one thing about her.  Hell, I don't think you know anything, and I wouldn't trust you to tell me the truth if your life depended on it.  This woman is just another of the political hacks Obama is choosing for his cabinet and his advisors, and each choice he makes insures further that he won't accomplish anything.  I voted against him, and not for John McCain.  However, I was willing to give him a chance.  After the first round of speculation on his cabinet choices, I am much less inclined to do so.  I think the good ole US of A is headed for disaster faster than Obama can find people who will serve with him.  So Tenney, just go and screw yourself.  Your brain is defective. 

{"commentId":4143794,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"mlittlejohn1"}
  • 3 votes
#1.13 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:22 PM EST
{"commentId":4144298,"authorDomain":"goldfish4ob"}
goldfish4obamaDeleted
{"commentId":4144377,"authorDomain":"eagonc"}

So my question is : what was her stance on illegal immigration?  Is she one of these open borders types?  Does she support amnesty or enforcement?  Has she parroted the line that illegals are not deportable?  This is what interests me.

{"commentId":4144377,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"eagonc"}
    #1.15 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:56 PM EST
    {"commentId":4144533,"authorDomain":"droessler"}

    goldfish - she has.  the federal government is the one who has failed us regarding the border.  I believe that has belonged largely to Bush????  the Republicans???

    above average - you are anything but that.  a major portion of intelligence is patience, and I see you have little of that. 

    1.  political hacks?  based on what solid information YOU have? 
    2. won't accomplish anything?  both Napolitano and Obama have surely accomplished far more in their lives than most people.  they are do-ers, achievers. 
    3. not surprised you voted for McCain.  he promoted angry rejection of anything non-Republican, so I guess you fit that mold.
    4. willing to give him a chance?  Obama hasn't even taken office yet and already you are spouting.

    ready to help this country?  try putting all that energy into something constructive, and contributing to something positive. 

    {"commentId":4144533,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"droessler"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.16 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:06 PM EST
    {"commentId":4144918,"authorDomain":"mlittlejohn1"}

    Dorfy

    Intelligence has absolutely nothing to do with patience.  Actually, most geniuses, according to Mensa, are impatient people.  There is no causal effect.  You are just trying to show how smart you are and you accomplished the opposite.

    All of Obama's picks so far are from the Clinton administration.  Clearly, to anyone but a fool, these fall into the category of "political hacks".  If you want further information just read if you are capable.

    Your comments on McCain are a lie and you cannot substantiate them.  You again are a talking like a fool.

    Obama ran on change we can believe in.  So far, nothing he has done will or can promote change.  So, you tell me why my confidence should be increasing instead of decreasing.  You cannot;  all you have to offer are further platitudes.  When I read your comments it does nothing to show me that you know anything about Obama at all.  You are just hoping, and you have no basis for your hope.  Again, that is pure foolishness.

    {"commentId":4144918,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"mlittlejohn1"}
    • 2 votes
    #1.17 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:32 PM EST
    {"commentId":4145289,"authorDomain":"rhondarhn"}

    All of you who are so incredibly NEGATIVE, please note:

     In November 2005, Time  magazine named Janet Napolitano as one of the five best governors in the U.S.

    In 1993, Napolitano was appointed by President Bill Clinton as United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. As U.S. attorney, she was involved in the investigation of Michael Fortier in connecton to the Oklahoma City Bombing. She ran for and won the position of state Attorney General in 1998. Her tenure focused on consumer protection issues and improving general law enforcement.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Napolitano

    {"commentId":4145289,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"rhondarhn"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.18 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:01 PM EST
    {"commentId":4150834,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

    A better choice would be to get rid of the Department of Homeland Security, it a giant bureaucracy that was the brain child of the president with no brain.

    I lived in Arizona when Napolitano was the AG, she didn't seem bad. As long as she doesn't bring that jack booted thug, Joe Arpaio with her, it couldn't be that terrible.

    {"commentId":4150834,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.19 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:24 AM EST
    {"commentId":4152865,"authorDomain":"wildweasel66"}

    dorfy,

    the dems have obstructed any funding for a full border fence (as well as W's lack of concern for illegal immigration), any enforcement of immigration laws, criticized ICE raids.  in other words, they've done everything to ensure that more illegals get here, to vote illegally, for government benefits.

    stone,

    joe arpaio would be the ideal choice for homeland security. leftwingnutjobs like you dislike anyone who enforces the law, and makes jail time 'hard time'.  people like you think bill ayers is a hero.

    {"commentId":4152865,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"wildweasel66"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.20 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:19 AM EST
    {"commentId":4160992,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

    Joe Arpaio has a great PR agent, everyone that hasn't live in Maricopa County thinks he is the greatest thing since sliced bread. The part they don't tell you is that he hands out badges and guns to his drinking buddies and sends them out to parks on summer holidays to harass anyone and everyone they feel like. "Tent City" might be a good idea, but it is more a publicity stunt than anything. He isn't 'tough on crime' like he wants people to believe, he is just a dick with a badge.

    Also, fvck you, where do you get off calling me a leftwingnutjob (also ever heard of the Shift key of a space bar?) just because I don't wanna suck off every dick head that acts like a little Billy Bad Ass, giving all you rethuglicans fart knockers a boner.

    {"commentId":4160992,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.21 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:10 PM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4135990,"authorDomain":"texjuanon"}

    Napolitano is very thoughtful, intelligent, and tough, as well as a smart politican.  She had to be all of that in order to be a Democrat and a single woman elected as attorney general and then governor of Arizona, a bright red state.  In my opinion, Napolitano is a great choice, someone who has actual and meaningful experience in dealing with border security issues.

    And vesey, haven't you learned yet that most people who are leaders in government are lawyers?  That's just a fact.  And clients hire lawyers, not vice versa.  That you would criticize someone simply for being a lawyer, and for her one-time client (a law professor whose integrity was not at issue in the Senate hearings), and then would mention Jeffrey Dahmer as an example of some nefarious person with "a brain" to counter Mr. Tenny's praise leaves me at a total loss to understand the rational processes behind your thoughts and concerns.  Your responses to Mr. Tenny already indicate that it is you, not he, who has failed to engage in a serious conversation.

    {"commentId":4135990,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"texjuanon"}
    • 6 votes
    Reply#2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:46 AM EST
    {"commentId":4139757,"authorDomain":"silvergoldsmith1"}

    Thr rest of america would like to thank arizona for being our non-ending source of illegal aliens. get serious she is a democrat and lazy.

    {"commentId":4139757,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"silvergoldsmith1"}
    • 5 votes
    #2.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:32 PM EST
    {"commentId":4142692,"authorDomain":"icepick151-1"}

    wiseman4sure1:  this must a nothing more than a clever name...the state of Arizona's immigration policy has little to do with the surge of undocumented immigration that has occurred over the past 10-15 years.  NAFTA is more the culprit here than any other policy.  specifically, it is the ever-increasing deterioration of Mexico's agricultural industry (mainly in regards to corn) because of the massive influx in American surplus in Mexican markets.  the small farmers of northern and central Mexico simply cannot compete with American agri-business and end up losing everything.  This forces them to go north to the border towns to find under-paid jobs in American owned factories. 

    It doesn't take long for them to realize that they can't sustain themselves or their families under these conditions and what then is the alternative?  illegally entering the United States.  A wall will not stop it, anti-immigrant policy will not stop it, increased border patrol, citizen vigilante groups, and widespread anti-immigrant sentiment won't stop it.  These people are doing what is necessary to improve, if not simply sustain the lives of their families; this is a noble endeavor and if you are a family i would hope you would be willing to do the same...i know i would in a heartbeat. 

    All these realities fail to point out though the willingness bordering on dependency that American business (mainly agriculture, the same industry that is helping to destroy the Mexican economy) has on cheap, undocumented-immigrant labor.  In order to address this problem we need to create trade relationships that increase the living standard of Mexico not encourage and exploit its deterioration; nothing less will do.

    {"commentId":4142692,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"icepick151-1"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:18 PM EST
    {"commentId":4144429,"authorDomain":"eagonc"}

    Icepick, don't be a tool and make an argument for not trying.  I'm sure a lot of other people across the ocean would walk across our border too for personal needs, but it doesn't happen because there is an effective barrier ( an ocean ).  If you think economics is the root of this problem, that can be addressed with a mandatory 6 month sit in a local prison BEFORE being deported.  Mexicans will do the math and industry will relocate to the workers in Mexico.  Better for us, better for them.

    {"commentId":4144429,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"eagonc"}
    • 2 votes
    #2.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:00 PM EST
    {"commentId":4150848,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

    How is spending a mountain of cash housing inmates for 6 months a better plan?

    Any real immigration reform is going to have to go after the people that employ hundreds of illegal immigrants. But that would drive up prices of farm products big time, so it ain't happening anytime soon.

    A better plan is clean up the giant bureaucratic mess they call the Immigration and Naturalization Department (AKA La Migra).They make the DMV look like a well oiled machine, if it took a decade to get a DL, then there might be some comparison.

    {"commentId":4150848,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.4 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:27 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4136027,"authorDomain":"elizabethgoldmeer-1"}

    I was wondering what else she was going to be tapped for.  I didn't buy the transition team.

    She is a smart person, but we have a huge illegal immigration problem still, here in Arizona.

    Now I have to wonder what's in store for Arizona, other border states and country wide.  I have a feeling nothing will be done, but I'd be so happy to be wrong about that.

    {"commentId":4136027,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"elizabethgoldmeer-1"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:00 AM EST
    {"commentId":4137788,"authorDomain":"chris-18"}

    I'm thinking that Arizona's illeagal immigration issue has more to do with the border itself than who's living the governor's mansion.

    {"commentId":4137788,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"chris-18"}
    • 1 vote
    #3.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:12 AM EST
    {"commentId":4143293,"authorDomain":"verno1"}

    MaryPonders, the entire US has a huge illegal immigration problem.  They come across the border in many places and spread from there.  It is just not Az.

    {"commentId":4143293,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"verno1"}
    • 1 vote
    #3.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:53 PM EST
    {"commentId":4144076,"authorDomain":"elizabethgoldmeer-1"}

    verno, 

    I agree!

    They are everywhere, hiding in plain sight.

    {"commentId":4144076,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"elizabethgoldmeer-1"}
      #3.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:40 PM EST
      {"commentId":4145277,"authorDomain":null}

      MaryPonders,  This was probably the most profound comment of the day!  I'll give you that.  The truth is, Obama or any other politician for that matter, is going to put anyone in their cabinet unless he benefits in some way......I off the top of my head I would say,mmm Hispanic voters would be a very good guess.

      M

      {"commentId":4145277,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067"}
        #3.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:00 PM EST
        {"commentId":4150855,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

        I lived for a short while close to the US / Mexico border in Arizona. There are places where you could literally drive a truck through the fence, in fact I saw many trucks driven through said holes.

        {"commentId":4150855,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
        • 1 vote
        #3.5 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:29 AM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":4136189,"authorDomain":"bastinc"}

        This story does not seem to cover a key issue; what is her experience in national security or international security.  Being a lawyer or elected official doesn't tell me what experience she has as it relate to the Dept. of Homeland Security.  Maybe the press can publicize a job description and then discuss how she fits this job!

        {"commentId":4136189,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"bastinc"}
        • 3 votes
        Reply#4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:56 AM EST
        {"commentId":4139805,"authorDomain":"silvergoldsmith1"}

        I am sure that Obama* will keep his campaign promise to prohibit these people from doing the jobs that they are being appointed to for the first two years.

        {"commentId":4139805,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"silvergoldsmith1"}
          #4.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:35 PM EST
          {"commentId":4145328,"authorDomain":"rhondarhn"}

          To wiseman4sure1:

          You must really want Obama to fail.

          You should be aware that for Obama to succeed would be in EVERYONE's best interests.

          If Obama fails, then America fails.

          To wiseman4sure1, please go to FOX.

          Wise...not man, starts with the letter A.

          {"commentId":4145328,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"rhondarhn"}
          • 2 votes
          #4.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:04 PM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":4136357,"authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}

          Hello! She's Italian!!!  And for anyone that has worked with Italians very closely you will know that their pretention for South America or anything SPANISH will only show that anyone Latin working in Arizona will very quickly be dismissed or disregarded.  Putting her in this post will only strengthen Burlesconi's approach to immigration; either way it will be more pretention for the Italian American clubs of America to push their dominance in this country.  All this for a moment with heavy publicity dominated by the Italians with Burlesconi dubbing her the Pre donna for having such a post.  My question is why has Obama NOT named anyone Latin to his cabinet? Again if no one was paying attention to census by  2042 3 out of 5 will be latin in this country, and their day is coming as well.  I just hope they don't treat us the way we have always treated them.  It will come and it has to come.  God help us...

          {"commentId":4136357,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}
            Reply#5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:37 AM EST
            {"commentId":4137052,"authorDomain":"linda-f"}

            Correction she is American!

            {"commentId":4137052,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"linda-f"}
            • 3 votes
            #5.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:08 AM EST
            {"commentId":4138499,"authorDomain":"wilberta"}

            Linda...Thank You

            What a lot of people here are forgetting is this is only a suggestion..it is not Official yet

            and Besides if she does get the job and does not work out she can go...just like

            Rumsfield had to go...only Obama won't wait so long like GW did.

            {"commentId":4138499,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"wilberta"}
            • 2 votes
            #5.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:06 AM EST
            {"commentId":4141484,"authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}

            That may be on paper, but you can't argue peoples instinct character and historical relevance.  Like the many reporters that have published this suggestion also Italian its more about dominance at every level.  Just like the publishers that ran the Nancy Pelosi story about Berlesconi coming to this country and dubbing her a pri dona for being Italian and at the highest level of government in the United States.  Do you see the Queen of England coming here or any other symbolic representative from other countries coming here to honor their ethnic representation in this country.  Many people in office today came from somewhere else and they too are Americans..

            {"commentId":4141484,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}
              #5.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:09 PM EST
              {"commentId":4145352,"authorDomain":"rhondarhn"}

              To crutcharlotte:

              What a racist comment.

              To Linda-632448:

              Thank you.

              {"commentId":4145352,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"rhondarhn"}
              • 2 votes
              #5.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:05 PM EST
              {"commentId":4582730,"authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}

              Really, well i'll keep a look out for your user name when a topic on latin americans comes up and see where your chips lye. You a symbolic to the type of american that only sees things from their own surrounding and beliefs.  My solution to your condition is to continue to expand your narrow mind to your own discriminations that are ALWAYS at your convienence...

              {"commentId":4582730,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}
                #5.5 - Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:01 AM EST
                Reply
                {"commentId":4136411,"authorDomain":"zyzzyva"}

                I am not sure whether it is correct, but her reputation in Arizona is that of a "tough never married woman" (is that the politically correct way to state it?) who keeps her word.  She promised no increased taxes.  She has, however, increased nearly every fee she could find and enthusiastically supported spending millions of dollars to purchase and install multiple photo radar sites to help raise money.  By increasing fees and fines, she could avoid the mess and trouble of getting legislative or public support.

                As for her stand on illegal immigration, judging by the numbers still in the state and entering daily, it appears it is largely symbolic.  In the small Arizona town in which I live, illegal workers are hiding in plain sight and the "feel good" words of our leader don't seem to make a difference.  They do make good construction workers, landscapers, farm laborers, and food service workers, though, don't they Janet? 

                {"commentId":4136411,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"zyzzyva"}
                • 3 votes
                Reply#6 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:49 AM EST
                {"commentId":4136481,"authorDomain":"marye877"}

                I have driven those freeways in the Scottsdale and Phoenix area and the photo cameras are put there and are helping in order to cut down the fatal accidents caused by very excessive speeding.  If people have to pay huge fines in order to keep us a little safer, I'm all for using that money.  Remember how long AZ was the state with the highest DUIs and fatalities?

                As to the illegals, due to the increased fencing and patrol by the Feds in Texas and California, AZ became the channel for the coyotes.  If she had not done as much as possible to patrol the borders, we would have many more illegals in the state. 

                In all printed and spoken news I have never heard her referred to as a butch tough lesbian.  Yes, I have heard she has never married, and so in your opinion does that keep women from office?  Are you one of those who think women should be beaten, kept barefoot and pregnant under the control of some guy?  Your prejudice is showing.

                I

                {"commentId":4136481,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"marye877"}
                • 3 votes
                #6.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:59 AM EST
                {"commentId":4136545,"authorDomain":"marye877"}

                Gee, I'm glad to see you changed some of your more explicit words.  Sounds a lot more reasonable now.

                {"commentId":4136545,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"marye877"}
                  #6.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:09 AM EST
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":4136418,"authorDomain":"marye877"}

                  Having lived in AZ the entire time she has been governor, I have read much in the newspaper and have seen her speak.  She is an intelligent, fair-minded person.  One of her interests has been in expanding education.  And, I have read about how many times she had advocated the federal government to take care of the immigration problems and the financial costs in those areas while we AZ state taxpayers are paying for the health care and education of so many illegal immigrants.  I think she will do all possible to solve that problem.  When I heard someone ask her to run for president, she smiled and said she liked being governor of THIS state.  However, she has only two years left.  If she does move, we will really miss her,  but why shouldn't the entire country have a chance for the positive effects of her experience.

                  {"commentId":4136418,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"marye877"}
                  • 5 votes
                  Reply#7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:50 AM EST
                  {"commentId":4142447,"authorDomain":"mfernandez314"}

                  Thanks for your input Mary.  It's good to hear the point of view of someone who lives in the state.

                  {"commentId":4142447,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"mfernandez314"}
                    #7.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:03 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4143362,"authorDomain":"2goldengrams"}

                    To quote Hillary many years ago, "Why doesn't California stop whining about their illegal alien problem?"  Well, we had to fence our borders and so did Texas.  Why hasn't Arizona done the same thing?  Hmmmm?  She is a poor choice since she cannot even control Homeland Security in her own small, relatively lightly populated state.  Again, this is nothing but payoffs, folks.

                    {"commentId":4143362,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"2goldengrams"}
                      #7.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:57 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4150881,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

                      Plus it would be funny to see McCain's reaction when the Governor of AZ made it when he didn't.

                      {"commentId":4150881,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #7.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:37 AM EST
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":4136523,"authorDomain":"motormuis99"}

                      The amount of illegal mexicans flooding in to the country across her unsecure border is high enough.

                      How is this person a wise choice?

                      {"commentId":4136523,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"motormuis99"}
                      • 5 votes
                      Reply#8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:05 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4136593,"authorDomain":"marye877"}

                      She's a wise choice because she got more to patrol the border and kept after the Feds requesting and even billing them for all of the enforcement costs.  She is highly regarded by governors of other states.  Unless you live in a border state with daily news photos of the illegals running in groups to cross the border, you don't realize the enormity of the problem.  As far as I know the states are not the ones responsible for building fences, etc to patrol the border of the US with another country.  That's a federal responsibility and we can't expect the citizens of one state to absorb all of the costs and labor to do that.  The current situation is a huge failure of homeland security and she has the experience and information to come up with some good ideas.

                      {"commentId":4136593,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"marye877"}
                      • 2 votes
                      #8.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:14 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4136817,"authorDomain":"spreadex"}

                         How unthoughtful a question. Being as how our southern border is like a sieve would you not say a person that is extremely familiar with the problem would be a wise choice? After all the border may invite more sinister people to try and enter our country for other reasons. Other than people coming across for work there is also the drug trade and other enterprises that involve money and people who will do anything for it.

                      {"commentId":4136817,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"spreadex"}
                      • 2 votes
                      #8.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:43 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4137090,"authorDomain":"zyzzyva"}

                      You can build your walls and fences.  You can station thousands more law enforcement and military personnel along the border.  Then stand at the border checkpoints and watch the number of people with some money and a car come across to go "shopping" in Tucson and Yuma or to "vacation."  They beat a path to Phoenix and file for assylum.  The Feds give them a receipt, a limited SS number and work pass, and a date about 6 months away for administrative decision.  They lose the decision and are automatically given a hearing date, again another 6 months to a year away.  They lose the hearing and can apply for appeal with the Bureau of Immigration Appeals, which takes about a year.  They lose at BIA and have the right to file for US Court of Appeals, which can take up to 2 years more.  Now they have been in the country about 4-5 years, have had the legal right to work, and are well established in their chosen community.  Their neighbors see them as good people who work hard for what they have, and turn a blind or unknowing eye toward their immigration status, hence hiding in plain sight. 

                      As for using photo radar to keep people safe, I think that is an accidental side benefit to the intended purpose of raising money and certainly makes it more palatable for those who think bigger government imposing more and more control over the general public is a bad thing. 

                      I may have many prejudices, but the one you pointed at is not one of them.  I am a cynic who cannot seem to find an honest politician.  "Change you can believe in" appears to me to be what you get back after you turn in your paper money to the government.  If Obama continues to appoint people who are no more qualified than his ardent supporter Janet Napolitano, then this country is in deep trouble.  I refuse to follow blindly with no cynicism.  Jumping to a fledgling is the beginning of a new life experience.  To a lemming it is death.  Know who you are and what you believe in first.

                      {"commentId":4137090,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"zyzzyva"}
                      • 3 votes
                      #8.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:11 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4140129,"authorDomain":"bhatgirl"}

                      Amazed: The term "honest politician" is an oxymoron.

                      {"commentId":4140129,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"bhatgirl"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #8.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:56 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4143360,"authorDomain":"verno1"}

                      Longhair.  So it's her fault the illegals are coming across?  I thought that was more of a federal problem.  US border patrol.  Not AZ border patrol.

                      {"commentId":4143360,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"verno1"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #8.5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:57 PM EST
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":4136970,"authorDomain":"chellescheid"}

                      Napatano negotiated with inmates at the Lewis Complex for the longest prison standoff in US history and this is Obama’s best choice to defend our homeland.  Really?  These prisoners raped the male and female guard for days and the governor knew this at the time she was giving them food and beer and allowing the prisoners to talk their families and then GAVE them the transfers they wanted.

                      Have the Arizona governor handle our children’s education, she at least cares about children.

                      {"commentId":4136970,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"chellescheid"}
                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:58 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4137611,"authorDomain":"eaglwlker"}

                      Change, what change?  Looks to me like almost every one he is picking is part of a past administration.  How about some new faces.

                      {"commentId":4137611,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"eaglwlker"}
                      • 7 votes
                      Reply#10 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:56 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4140333,"authorDomain":"sichuan"}

                      You would rather Obama select someone without past political experience? All of Bush's appointments have proven to be inept. Obama could appoint the Three Stooges and their friends to all positions and they would be an improvement over anybody Bush appointed.

                      {"commentId":4140333,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"sichuan"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #10.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:10 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4143396,"authorDomain":"verno1"}

                      William:  And where do we come up with these new faces?  They just don't grow on trees.  If he picked someone else, a year down the road you would be saying  "Why didn't he pick someone with experience?"

                      {"commentId":4143396,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"verno1"}
                        #10.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:58 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4582877,"authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}

                        I don't think so; are you saying that these reruns are the only QUALIFIED people in the country.  Heck no there were millions before them, as there are millions more qualified now.  They too began somewhere in the political spectrum with no experience.  And the sad truth in life is that their is no originality, everything is cut and paste. How hard of a job can that be for anyone with or with out government experience.  And further more state employees are a good representation of what government experience means to our day to day.  I think I would rather then ran a national ad for help wanted and interviewed all that applied. 

                        {"commentId":4582877,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}
                          #10.3 - Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:25 AM EST
                          Reply
                          {"commentId":4137740,"authorDomain":"chris-18"}

                          Choosing a border-state guv. for DHS is pretty savvy, whether you agree with her policies as governor or not. This pick represents some of the big-idea changes that this country needs. 

                          {"commentId":4137740,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"chris-18"}
                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#11 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:07 AM EST
                          {"commentId":4137754,"authorDomain":"wildweasel66"}

                          the open border advocates take over immigration. fantastic, now we'll have 25 million illegals in the country, all voting next election. 

                          after nearly 1 million deportations the past year, this is a huge step backwards.

                          {"commentId":4137754,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"wildweasel66"}
                          • 4 votes
                          Reply#12 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:09 AM EST
                          {"commentId":4140827,"authorDomain":"ljw0101"}

                          Due to the recession and lack of work, illegals have been heading back across the border. Napolitano's requirement to force employers to verify SS#s will only increase this trend. they won't come across if they can't work. she's right in that if you build a 50 ft wall, they'll find a 51 ft ladder...a 1500 mile long impenetrable border fence patrolled by armed guards is simply not going to happen. when your drugs wear off, try thinking of realistic solutions.

                          {"commentId":4140827,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"ljw0101"}
                          • 1 vote
                          #12.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:36 PM EST
                          {"commentId":4141542,"authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}

                          Really!  Well I'll be that if it were Italy sitting next door to us would those same fences and wall be built.  For that matter any other country; if it were sitting next door would we have the same resentments we tend to harbor for Mexico. Ask yourself this; why is it we have no problems with Canada? Is it because they have the same origination as anglo America? This bully in school yard needs to stop, and realize we have the same goals and destiny regardless of individual pride and prejudice. 

                          {"commentId":4141542,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}
                            #12.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:13 PM EST
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":4138401,"authorDomain":"ruckusy2k"}

                            I'm just curious as to what experience a governor, any governor, could have to be the head of DHS?  They may have some local or state experience but that's nothing compared to national security.  Come on, can't we find someone more suitable?

                            {"commentId":4138401,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"ruckusy2k"}
                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#13 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:59 AM EST
                            {"commentId":4138598,"authorDomain":"wildweasel66"}

                            maricopa county sherriff joe arpaio

                            {"commentId":4138598,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"wildweasel66"}
                            • 6 votes
                            #13.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:12 AM EST
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":4138458,"authorDomain":"beaone"}

                            Janet is the first governor we've had in Arizona in ages who hasn't had some sort of scandal floating around her.  Her qualifications are outstanding.  She's fair on immigration, much more than McCain, in a state that has become a powder keg on illegals, she's enforced the laws the voters passed except for the ones that were deemed unconstitutional, and she's about as bipartisan as a governor can be.  She's worked hard to make the Feds pick up the costs for assistance to illegals in this state.  She was easily re-elected by both parties for her second term and it hasn't been easy with the legislature trying to pass some pretty silly laws.  Obama's gain will definitely be our loss.

                            {"commentId":4138458,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"beaone"}
                            • 3 votes
                            Reply#14 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:03 AM EST
                            {"commentId":4139088,"authorDomain":"jchornback"}

                            I don't see that the Gov. of Arizona is qualified to be the Sec. of DHS.  I don't really see any of the potential pics for Obama's cabinet being all that qualified for any posts that they've been eyed for? Granted, not too many of Bush's pics have been all that glorious either so maybe the new folks will be heads and tails over what we've had.  As long as our new Pres. does something quick about the economy and a good Treas. Sec.; that's what really matters to me.  Bailout's galore isn't the answer but I don't know what is.  Having been a Bush supporter until very recently; I see that our current administration has been asleep at the wheel about the economy and focusing a bit too much on the mid-east issues when perhaps they should have been eyeing the crap going on in the banks and the house/senate oversight.  I would be interested in knowing how many of those charged with oversight really care unless they are personally affected by the economy other than being questioned by the voters for their lack of oversight.  I would also be interested to know who and how many of them benefited from this mess in the long run.  I'm not impressed with anyone in Washington right now and don't see any efforts passed by the house/senate have helped and any proposed efforts will either.  We've sunk to a new low that we're not sinking anymore but now we're actually digging...not just digging dirt anymore....now it's sh@& we are digging and started to eat it now.  Humm...at least I still have a job. 

                            {"commentId":4139088,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"jchornback"}
                              Reply#15 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:46 AM EST
                              {"commentId":4139102,"authorDomain":"tigereaz"}

                              Paul and Beaz , please wait to come off your meth high before posting - Napolitano is a GD disaster - and proudly continues to hold Arizona among the lowest rated states for human services , education and average wage ... she wasn't worth a damn as AG and has perfected that as governor ... Homeland defense? Napolitano ? Shouldn't be seen in the same sentence.

                              {"commentId":4139102,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"tigereaz"}
                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#16 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:47 AM EST
                              {"commentId":4142443,"authorDomain":"beaone"}

                              Blame cheap labor and small town mentality.

                              {"commentId":4142443,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"beaone"}
                                #16.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:03 PM EST
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":4140081,"authorDomain":"bstritzel"}

                                Can someone explain to me the difference between Joe Lieberman's position with Homeland Security and now Napolitano's appointment?  I'm not clear on this.

                                {"commentId":4140081,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"bstritzel"}
                                  Reply#17 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:53 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4140281,"authorDomain":"wildweasel66"}

                                  Lieberman is an advocate of closing the borders, and having people immigrant legally. napolitano's appointment is merely a payback for her signing on to the Annoited Messiah early, and represents a win for open border advocates (people who would do away with ICE, criminal checks on immigrants, and oppose any formal immigration agency).

                                  {"commentId":4140281,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"wildweasel66"}
                                  • 3 votes
                                  #17.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:06 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4144657,"authorDomain":"beaone"}

                                  All of which is untrue.  Lieberman's border policy is more liberal than Janet's. 

                                  {"commentId":4144657,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"beaone"}
                                    #17.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:15 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4144695,"authorDomain":"droessler"}

                                    Lieberman chairs a Senate Committee.   They meet occasionally - talk and investigate and gather information (if they do anything at all).

                                    This position proposed for Napolitano is a presidential Cabinet position.   She would advise the president and act on the president's behalf regarding policies, deploying resources, encouraging new laws on the hill if appropriate.    BIG difference.  

                                     "Last year, her state passed a law that requires all Arizona businesses to use the federal online database, E-Verify, to confirm that new hires have valid Social Security numbers and are eligible for employment. .."   These are concrete steps taken to discourage illegal aliens from coming in to AZ because it will be hard for them to prove legal ID.   At the state level - that is all you can do.  The federal government can do more, and she will then be closer to policy-makers to make things better. 

                                    {"commentId":4144695,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"droessler"}
                                      #17.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:18 PM EST
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":4140271,"authorDomain":"hannus7186"}

                                      hey az at least we will have a republican as gov for awhile.

                                      {"commentId":4140271,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"hannus7186"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#18 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:05 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":4140343,"authorDomain":"bstritzel"}

                                      What you explained to me is their positions on Homeland Security.  What I want to know is - is Napolitano replacing Joe Lieberman?

                                      {"commentId":4140343,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"bstritzel"}
                                        Reply#19 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:10 PM EST
                                        {"commentId":4140652,"authorDomain":"sherriekevin"}

                                        No.  She is a governor.  He is a Senator.  Even the great Obama cannot replace a Senator from Connecticut.  Her appointment would be at the Secretary level. 

                                        {"commentId":4140652,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"sherriekevin"}
                                          #19.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:27 PM EST
                                          {"commentId":4141537,"authorDomain":"bstritzel"}

                                          I see.  So they would be working together then.....Thank you, Go USA.  I appreciate it.

                                          {"commentId":4141537,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"bstritzel"}
                                            #19.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:13 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":4143471,"authorDomain":"verno1"}

                                            Liberman is not in charge of Home Land Security, he is on a committee.  He does not run Homeland Security.

                                            {"commentId":4143471,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"verno1"}
                                              #19.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:02 PM EST
                                              Reply
                                              {"commentId":4140647,"authorDomain":"ljw0101"}

                                              It's funny that repubs are griping about Obama's putting people with Washington experience in important positions....their style is appoint incompetent cronies like Brownie

                                              {"commentId":4140647,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"ljw0101"}
                                                Reply#20 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:27 PM EST
                                                {"commentId":4140703,"authorDomain":"sherriekevin"}

                                                I say close the borders and deport those who are here illegally.  Essentially just being here is a crime.  As the opening credits on "Law and Order" say, "...Prosecute the offenders."

                                                {"commentId":4140703,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"sherriekevin"}
                                                • 1 vote
                                                Reply#21 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:30 PM EST
                                                {"commentId":4140938,"authorDomain":"ljw0101"}

                                                "close the border" = build a 1500 mile long impenetrable barrier patrolled with armed guards.

                                                "deport those who are here illegally" = having ICE agents kicking doors in every barrio between LA and Boston and checking for valid papers...then sending all 12 million people they catch through deportation proceedings.

                                                get a grip. your suggestions are ridiculous red meat talking points. we need a comprehensive, balanced, humane, and feasible solution to illegal immigration.

                                                {"commentId":4140938,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"ljw0101"}
                                                  #21.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:42 PM EST
                                                  {"commentId":4144689,"authorDomain":"beaone"}

                                                  Perhaps starting with the 30+ million dollars the Bush Administration is spending yearly to fly the illegals back home would be a better place to start.   This the only airline not in financial trouble.  

                                                  {"commentId":4144689,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"beaone"}
                                                    #21.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:17 PM EST
                                                    Reply
                                                    {"commentId":4140733,"authorDomain":"flamingoloosa"}

                                                    Please - leave Hilary where she can best serve our nation by improving our healthcare system.

                                                    {"commentId":4140733,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"flamingoloosa"}
                                                      Reply#22 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:31 PM EST
                                                      {"commentId":4140818,"authorDomain":"flamingoloosa"}

                                                      Please - leave Hilary where she can best serve our country by making healthcare affordable to all.

                                                      {"commentId":4140818,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"flamingoloosa"}
                                                        Reply#23 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:36 PM EST
                                                        {"commentId":4140830,"authorDomain":"bloggit"}

                                                        Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano Faces Backlash For Vetoing Illegal Immigration Bills

                                                        By Digger

                                                        Having vetoed nearly 60 bills in her term, including some key bills to cut benefits and the flow of illegal aliens into the state, Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano is facing a political backlash that could cost her re-election in 2006. The nearly 60 vetoes is the most by any Governor in the states history.

                                                        Bills she has vetoed include one denying in-state tuition and day care for illegal aliens and one allowing law enforcement to enforce immigration law on May 20. On May 10 she also vetoed a bill making English the official state language which would have allowed the state to save money by not having to provide all official documents in multiple languages and would have encourage assimilating immigrants into the American culture more effectively.

                                                        She also vetoed a bill that would have officially rejected the Matricula Consular from Mexico as a valid form of identification which an FBI official has said are "easy to forge" and a "major item on the product list of fraudulent document trade currently flourishing across the country and around the world.".

                                                        Uh....sure.  This is just the kind of spineless politician we need for DHS, and for protecting our southern border.

                                                        {"commentId":4140830,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"bloggit"}
                                                        • 6 votes
                                                        Reply#24 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:36 PM EST
                                                        {"commentId":4143900,"authorDomain":"mndrmnn"}

                                                        umm, did she lose her re-election bid? 

                                                        {"commentId":4143900,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"mndrmnn"}
                                                          #24.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:29 PM EST
                                                          {"commentId":4144750,"authorDomain":"eagonc"}

                                                          She didn't, but neither did Bush.  Doesn't mean their ideas are right.  She should have passed every law up there.

                                                          {"commentId":4144750,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"eagonc"}
                                                            #24.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:21 PM EST
                                                            {"commentId":4582774,"authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}

                                                            Do you really believe she acted on this ruling on her own?? We don't have single minded, self acting politicians anymore.  They take their orders from above, she only vetoed it due to the fact that if all illegals, and according to most discriminative bastards on the blog that would also deport all LEGAL latins back to South America would be devistating to the contruction sector of our economy, basically kicking us where we live.  Americas average age is nearly or could even have surpassed 50; I hope they all do go home, and leave a @!$%# load of work that must be done behind to an age group that is already licking it chops to the day when they can quit working and start receiving their government checks.

                                                            {"commentId":4582774,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}
                                                              #24.3 - Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:11 AM EST
                                                              Reply
                                                              {"commentId":4140971,"authorDomain":"SuznAZ"}

                                                              Well, a good choice for President-elect Obama but a great loss for Arizona. Gov Janet is a talented and intelligent person who will serve this country well. Our next in line for Gov, Jan Brewer's first comment was that she's not a "tax and spend"...elected official. How to be gracious and show you'll represent the state not just your party...not. Gov. Napolitano is a voice of reason in a state too often ruled by the hard right. Brewer will likely open the floodgates to more GOP partisanship than ever.

                                                              {"commentId":4140971,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"SuznAZ"}
                                                              • 1 vote
                                                              Reply#25 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:44 PM EST
                                                              {"commentId":4582816,"authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}

                                                              Love when I read comments by writers like you, I'll bet you met her once maybe twice at a state or local function and now your a groupy.  Measure your leaders by their actions for the work we pay them to do, and not some Hollywood, poster on the wall mentality.

                                                              {"commentId":4582816,"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067","authorDomain":"carlrutledge"}
                                                                #25.1 - Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:16 AM EST
                                                                Reply
                                                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                                                {"canLink":false,"threadId":"423853","isPrivate":false}
                                                                Leave a Comment:
                                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                {"threadId":"423853","contentId":"2131067"}
                                                                Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                                Stop TrackingStop Tracking