Visit Paul William Tenny's column >>

PAUL WILLIAM TENNYHome Page

Freelance screenwriter living in North Carolina
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 276; Links Seeded: 1329
Member Since: 9/2006Last Seen: 11/24/2009

GM to return two leased jets amid criticism

Read ArticleArticle Source: msnbc.com
advertisement

General Motors Corp will return two of its leased corporate jets amid intense criticism in Washington this week on the luxury travel arrangements of its chief executive.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
6.5
3.0
2.9
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4 ... 9
{"commentId":4155352,"authorDomain":"MinnesotaDon"}

"for security reasons?"     whatever other complaints we might have about commercial aviation, lack of security surely isn't one.   Or are they concerned that the other passengers will attack him with plastic forks?

{"commentId":4155352,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"MinnesotaDon"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#26 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:58 PM EST
{"commentId":4155913,"authorDomain":"caroln-1"}

Security?????  For a CEO??????  What other cr*p will they try to throw??!!!

Joe Biden takes the commuter train almost every day and he just happens to be a United States Senator!!!

{"commentId":4155913,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"caroln-1"}
  • 3 votes
#26.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:31 PM EST
{"commentId":4158744,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

Carol, news flash. Joe Biden is now Vice President of the United States of America!  LOL!!!  I'm sure his commuter train days are over ;) 

{"commentId":4158744,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
  • 1 vote
#26.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:19 PM EST
{"commentId":4159295,"authorDomain":"DrKnow"}

Cheney is Vice-President. Biden is still the Senator from New Jersey and will remain so until he resigns. (He wants to pass the seat to his son...)

{"commentId":4159295,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"DrKnow"}
  • 2 votes
#26.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:53 PM EST
{"commentId":4159568,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

DrKnow, I was only joking. 

However, I do believe Senator Biden is the Senator for Delaware, not NJ  ;)

{"commentId":4159568,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
  • 1 vote
#26.4 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:09 PM EST
{"commentId":4179291,"authorDomain":"david393071"}

Sandra-293107

DrKnow, I was only joking. 

However, I do believe Senator Biden is the Senator for Delaware, not NJ  ;)

#24.4 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:09 PM HST

Senator Joseph Robinette Biden is the Senator from Delaware, and his constituents (legal clients) are (recognize them?):
Delaware: Freddie Mac, Fanny Mae, Bank of America, Wilmington Trust, First USA / Bank One / JPMorgan Chase, AIG, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, Barclays plc, GM, Chrysler, Wachovia, ExxonMobil, Chevron, ISDA, and those States with Corporations Incorporated at Delaware. 

Source Encyclopeae: 1990s to 2007s.

Especially, ISDA. The People that brought you:  the 60 to 100 Trillion USD (it is not 700 Billion USD US Economic Crisis) Global Economic Crisis.  These people will be back for more just like GM, Ford, Chysler, September 2008, 25 Billion, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, to milk the cash cow.  updated add: AIG, Billions USD.  The 60 to 100 Trillion USD does not include the usary interest protected by the Delaware Court of Chancery.
Source International Swaps and Derrivatives Association Incorporated (Delaware). isda.org.
 
Over 50% of US publicly-traded corporations and 60% of the Fortune 500 companies are incorporated in Delaware;[1] the state's attractiveness as a corporate haven is largely due to its business-friendly corporation law. Franchise taxes on Delaware corporations supply about one-fifth of its state revenue.[2]
1. Delaware Corporate Notebook
2. Delaware General Fund 2007 by Category.

{"commentId":4179291,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"david393071"}
    #26.5 - Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:58 PM EST
    {"commentId":4179378,"authorDomain":"david393071"}

    Also about catching commuter trains.  Did you ever hear about the NCL, National City Lines?  The people that bought out the working rail mass transit in 48 major cities then tore them down and replaced them with buses.

    NCL now NTL = GM (buses), Firestone (tires for GM Buses), Standard Oil of California (Fuel for GM Buses), Philips Petroleum (Engine Oil, Grease, Fuel).

    How can they ride something that they were responsible for destroying?

    {"commentId":4179378,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"david393071"}
      #26.6 - Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:08 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4155374,"authorDomain":"raco099"}

      Got to love the media... The critisim had nothing to do with the return of the jets... Returning these two or their seven has been a planned transaction for over a year.

      {"commentId":4155374,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"raco099"}
        Reply#27 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:00 PM EST
        {"commentId":4166995,"authorDomain":"agboola-2"}

        you'd think they would have planned it much sooner.  They've only been loosing billions for months.

        {"commentId":4166995,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"agboola-2"}
          #27.1 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 11:39 AM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":4155377,"authorDomain":"lljoell"}

          Returning the leased jets is a step in the right direction.  Despite all the whining that corporate jets are essential for executive travel, just a minimum of planning could eliminate the need to use them.  Corporate "C" level executives are America's royalty because they live the equivalent of royal lives on the dollars that we investors give them.  They have come to see themselves as entitled to all the largess granted them by incestuous boards of directors.  The same executives require their labor force to travel economy class.  And, no, Chrysler, your use of corporate jets is not a "private matter" when you are begging for public funding.  Your private company is suddenly a public entity when you survive on taxpayer money.  These guys have forgotten how to run a company - they need to get back to basic leadership priciples.  They can start re-learning by reading Up the Organization and Further up the Organization by Robert Townsend.

          {"commentId":4155377,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"lljoell"}
            Reply#28 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:00 PM EST
            {"commentId":4155501,"authorDomain":"fasracer"}

            Corporate jets are necessary no matter what anyone says.  The last thing a company needs is to have expensive personel sitting in airports being non productive. 

            I certainly don't want my exes sitting around when I pay them as well as I do or perhaps getting caught on a runway for hours at a time.

            {"commentId":4155501,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"fasracer"}
              #28.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:07 PM EST
              {"commentId":4155547,"authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}

              Clay,

              The BIG difference is that your company is not begging for a ton of money from the US taxpayers!

              {"commentId":4155547,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}
              • 2 votes
              #28.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:10 PM EST
              {"commentId":4155690,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

              Clay, with all due respect, you've already supplied your executives with a laptop.  If their commercial flight is delayed, chances are the charter one would be too.  That's when you pay for the grand or so a year for them to go to the Airline Hospitality Room where they can continue working on their "laptop."  I don't see the productivity issue here.  Sounds like either your Execs or some Jet Charter company has sold you a bill of goods.

              Look at post 19.2.  I provided you with some "real" numbers.  How much could your company be saving?

              {"commentId":4155690,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
              • 4 votes
              #28.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:19 PM EST
              {"commentId":4155729,"authorDomain":"fasracer"}

              That is for darn sure I am asking for nothing.  Originally I  was not convinced when my controller told me we needed a corporat jet.  But now we have 2 and we save a lot of money as opposed to using commercial.  So the jet issue does not bother me and if people knew what the bottom line was they would not be so upset. 

              I understand why they are upset.  The man on the street sees the jet as nothing but an expense but once the numbers go to the paper, it is not a luxury

              {"commentId":4155729,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"fasracer"}
                #28.4 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:21 PM EST
                {"commentId":4155756,"authorDomain":"carolk"}

                Also to Clay -- no excuses as laptops, cell phones, telephone conference calling and many other electronic methods of communication are available these days.  It is not mandatory to be sitting at the same walnut conference table in order to accomplish business, nor is it sensitive to the "non" executive staff who must accomodate their own schedules to further the ease of the execs.  Please see my comment below.  If all of you people would stop thinking like you're so very special and learn or re-learn how to live like the "common" people (and I don't mean "welfare" "illegal aliens" "lower class" or any other demeaning term, but rather working class or as Obama says "middle" class), you would learn how to be more efficient.  This waste more, want more mentality is now out of tune to the rest of the country.

                {"commentId":4155756,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"carolk"}
                • 3 votes
                #28.5 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:22 PM EST
                {"commentId":4156099,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

                Clay, you make a convincing point (especially backing it up with your Controller's recommendation), but I'd still have to see those numbers on the balance sheet  ;)

                You stated later that you "own" your Corporate Jets (you don't Charter).  Again, no financial guru, but I'd want to see the projected amortization of owning these aircraft in addition to maintenance fees, pilot's fees, cleaning fees, hangar fees, etc.

                {"commentId":4156099,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
                  #28.6 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:41 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4156689,"authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}

                  But I think what matters is that Clay made a business decision for his company, and isn't going to Congress begging the taxpayers to bail him out. I have no problem with that, regardless of what it costs his company. There's a big difference in my mind about that issue.

                  {"commentId":4156689,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #28.7 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:14 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4157021,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

                  Jim, yes, great point!  Another point that was made is that there were 17 GM employees who traveled to Washington, so the company jet would make sense.

                  Interesting that there was such a large number from one company going to Washington.  I ask, "Why were they all invited?" 

                  {"commentId":4157021,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #28.8 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:33 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4157983,"authorDomain":"donnworley"}

                  and where were they during the hearings? 

                  {"commentId":4157983,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"donnworley"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #28.9 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:31 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4158781,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

                  Donn, good question!  Where the heck were all of these 17 GM employees that went to Washington for this meeting?  Sure wasn't on the Preparedness Task Force to get their CEO's ready for the meeting .... that's for da_n sure!

                  {"commentId":4158781,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #28.10 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:21 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4167051,"authorDomain":"agboola-2"}

                  I don't understand the logic on how execs needprivate jets to travel.  Aren't these the same execs that pay their subordinates to wait in line for commercial planes when they go on their business meetings. 

                  Hundreds of business men fly commercial everyday all around the world, and these 3 want me to believe that they can't manage business the same way?  Heaven help 'em if they have to travel like commoners!

                  {"commentId":4167051,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"agboola-2"}
                    #28.11 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 11:44 AM EST
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":4155440,"authorDomain":"pdwhitford"}

                    I like the Bozo's answer from Chrysler - "it's a private matter"!?!  Not any more - not if you want taxpayer money to bail you out - may as well get ready to answer a lot of questions and make alot of disclosures OR you could just get some "private money" to tide you over.

                    I think that guy needs to go work for AIG - same mentality...

                    {"commentId":4155440,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"pdwhitford"}
                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#29 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:04 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4155443,"authorDomain":"jay9465"}

                    I like how the government will blast the auto makers for needless spending, but give wall street a bailout without any questions. The auto makers are the ones that will actually keep main street working, not wall street!

                    {"commentId":4155443,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"jay9465"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#30 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:04 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4155456,"authorDomain":"steveurkel"}
                    Steven-446650Deleted
                    {"commentId":4155458,"authorDomain":"jeremyrfitzpatrick"}

                    "Private Matter"????  They are begging for a bailout from the taxpayers!  Let them all fail.  Maybe Toyota or someone else will pick up the valuable pieces and fill the void.  It would not be nearly as devastating as they would have you believe.

                    {"commentId":4155458,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"jeremyrfitzpatrick"}
                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#32 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:05 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4155475,"authorDomain":"kramerforbcc"}

                    The same needs to be done for AIG and the other financial institutions! Also, it is about time that the obscene million dollar salaries of the CEO's and other upper management be taken a look at.  Anyone can be replaced! Even those executives who have an "entitlement for the rich" mentality.

                    {"commentId":4155475,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"kramerforbcc"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#33 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:06 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4155511,"authorDomain":"lenjudt"}

                    If the Speaker of the House would forgo her goverment supplied jet to go back to CA every week we could save a lot money. She is no better than the CEOs of the big three auto makers.  

                    {"commentId":4155511,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"lenjudt"}
                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#34 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:08 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4155554,"authorDomain":"thrwrld-75"}
                    renzo75Deleted
                    {"commentId":4155613,"authorDomain":"carolk"}

                    If these three bozos are head of the auto industry, why don't they drive like everyone else?  Then they too can experience fluctuating gas prices, the condiitons of surface roads and freeways (expressways), the pain of traffic jams at commute hours, etc.  Not BE driven in a limosine but actually DRIVING their own cars!!  They can plan ahead like everyone else, pack an overnight bag, stay at a Motel 6 instead of at the Four Season or comparable hotel, and return the same way they came.  They can figure out that even spending four days travelling costs less money than $20,000.00 for a round-trip private jet ride, they can do "on site" research in their Chevys, Fords, and Chryslers, they can find our why Subaru beats all of them for extreme winter driving conditions, they can learn that more people than not live on $20,000.00 a YEAR, not a day, and they can come back humbled and wiser for the exprience the next time they propose asking for a bailout.  To the CEO who lives in Seattle, why don't you spend a week in Spokane you numnut?

                    {"commentId":4155613,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"carolk"}
                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#36 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:14 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4155628,"authorDomain":"woodview"}

                    Two leased jets out of how many did they say???

                    {"commentId":4155628,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"woodview"}
                      Reply#37 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:15 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4155638,"authorDomain":"bettercab"}

                      The use of corporate jets to attend their beggar's banquet is more symbolic than real. These guys absolutely don't get it I'd like to see the likes of Waggoner drive to Washington in a ten year old Chevy(if it makes it there). They might understand a little better why they're in the position they're in today.

                      {"commentId":4155638,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"bettercab"}
                        Reply#38 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:16 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4155663,"authorDomain":"Dijeau"}

                        Next time they go to Washington, The Auto industry reps should drive up in one of the GM prototype "Fuel Cell" cars that they can not build untill the Government helps build an infrustructure to FUEL THEM.

                          The only coast to coast infrastruture we have today is for OIL based Fuels.  GM has spent a Billion Dollars on developing  a new "FUEL CELL" platform that runs on Hydrogen and Oxygen to make Elecricity for an Electric car.  The same Hydrogen, that is injected into oil to make Gasoline, could be pumped directly into cars tanks and the only byproduct would be WATER.

                          Our goverment has been using this method of creating electricity since the start of the Space program in the 1960s and we can get all the Hydrogen we want from Sea Water and solar Panels.

                          BIG OIL Owns Washington untill January 20, 2009.  After that, we will see.    

                        {"commentId":4155663,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Dijeau"}
                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#39 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:17 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4155676,"authorDomain":"jeremyrfitzpatrick"}

                        I understand the big salaries for CEOs.  I have no problem with them, unless you are a failure.  If you're on the verge of bankruptcy, then you need to help yourself first. 

                        I'd love to make $28 million per year and be allowed to beg the government for money to keep the company alive.  Of course, I'm not sure anyone can save these companies.  A bailout only delays the inevitable.  Let them fail, then pick up the pieces and move forward. We should never let a company get too big to fail.

                        {"commentId":4155676,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"jeremyrfitzpatrick"}
                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#40 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:18 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4155831,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

                        Jeremy, I believe these Big3 could do a complete turnaround, and be profitable.  However, it would take enormous changes, and those would have to start at the top.  Unless, Congress holds their feet to the fire with demands for meaningful change, then these companies have no hope.

                        However, I really do believe if the right changes were implemented, all Big 3 could be salvaged.  I, for one, would love nothing more than to see American made cars beat the pants off Japan, Germany and Korea!  We already do have the foundation.

                        It just takes a new direction (new leadership), a whole lot of commitment, and vision.

                        {"commentId":4155831,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
                        • 1 vote
                        #40.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:27 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4156395,"authorDomain":"collinsw08"}

                        I would like american made cars to beat the pants off foreign makers, but I don't see that happening without BIG changes.  I don't see the big three doing a whole lot of changes.  I am sick of the idea of giving these CEOs the money to keep business going.  They aren't going to make the kind of changes the public wants, they'll make a few adjustments to look good, but that's all. 

                        Our great leaders are going to give them the money. We better start preparing ourselves, it's what our democratic leaders want.  They only put off the vote because they knew if they gave the money now the public would be pissed off, but they will clean it up to make it look better and in December they will give them the money and nothing will change.  Well maybe the CEOs will have to scale down..  ha ha ha... Don't believe it.

                        {"commentId":4156395,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"collinsw08"}
                          #40.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:57 PM EST
                          {"commentId":4157095,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

                          Tired, absolutely, it was nothing more than a Dog & Pony Show, and Congress showed its behind just as much as the CEO's did (nothing has changed).  That was nothing more than when Congress pointed out excessive spending (the use of Corporate jets) .... that's like "the pot calling the kettle black."

                          And, Obama's message is that Washington must earn America's trust again?  I say, good luck with that!  I don't trust one of 'em as far as I could throw 'em!  They're all a bunch of crooks!

                          {"commentId":4157095,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
                          • 1 vote
                          #40.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:38 PM EST
                          {"commentId":4158889,"authorDomain":"billpiech"}

                          Sandra........I agree.  I didn't vote this year and that was my right.  I was so confused and sick of the dirty political smearing that I said the hell with it.  It doesn't matter.  Now that Obama will be our president, I pray to God to give him the strength to stand up for the American people.  A person who goes into politics may have idealistic visions but he/she are soon taken in with the "go with the flow" mentality and become as corrupt as their predecessors or else they run into a brick wall.  There will be a revolution in this country !!!  I don't know when but it's shaping up.

                          {"commentId":4158889,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"billpiech"}
                            #40.4 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:28 PM EST
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":4155697,"authorDomain":"tatia-j"}

                            I was a General Aviation Manager for 14 years now I am currently with out a job I was laid off in September, The amount of money used to lease a Jet would have paid my salary for 15 years. And how many people would that pay for one year. That makes me sick I am told I am told "why do you want to work for us with your work history,  I am working 3 part time, low paying  jobs. And I have told my 3 children that Christmas will be, just spending time together  being glad we have a place to live.
                            It makes me sick hard working people that would be ok for one year on 1/15 of the cost of flying that jet.

                            {"commentId":4155697,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"tatia-j"}
                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#41 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:19 PM EST
                            {"commentId":4155808,"authorDomain":"fasracer"}

                            Not sure where your expenses came from in your aviation dept, but in my dept, the 2 jets we have are both very cost efficent and we own them.  A years lease was 15 times your salary?  where you working for free or are we talking apples and oranges

                            {"commentId":4155808,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"fasracer"}
                              #41.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:25 PM EST
                              {"commentId":4155919,"authorDomain":"tatia-j"}

                              759,000.00 for one year, Yes I only made 60 tho, wish I still was. So do my children.

                              {"commentId":4155919,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"tatia-j"}
                              • 1 vote
                              #41.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:31 PM EST
                              {"commentId":4155922,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

                              Clay, now I understand.  You "own" your jets; not Charter.  Big difference.  These jets that the CEOs from the Big 3 are Charter Corporate Jets.  I'm no CEO like you, but I believe this is a "tax write-off" travel business expense for the companies at the end of the year.  However, still more expensive to write that off as Corporate Charter, as opposed to First Class commercial.

                              {"commentId":4155922,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
                              • 2 votes
                              #41.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:31 PM EST
                              {"commentId":4156749,"authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}

                              See 26.7 above.

                              {"commentId":4156749,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}
                                #41.4 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:17 PM EST
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":4155704,"authorDomain":"kdoylegti"}

                                It's very simple. Taxpayers just gave a 750 billion dollar bailout to the banks. Tell the banks to loan the money to the auto companies if it's such a good deal.

                                {"commentId":4155704,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"kdoylegti"}
                                • 3 votes
                                Reply#42 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:19 PM EST
                                {"commentId":4155745,"authorDomain":"uvbuyer"}

                                Wonder what the "early termination fee" was on those jets ? Must be millions......that'll show congress. LOL. Just another bad business decision by Generous Motors. Now they are going to shut down the Lordstown production plant. They build the small economical cars there. They are keeping the big truck plants open though.....that'll show congress that they can make good decisions. LOL .They are holding back payment to the dealers for rebates they give customers  till they get the "bailout"money from congress......that could add up to millions!!!! Another good move by GM. GM also sent a memo to dealers to "change the tv station in their customer waiting areas from CNN to Nickleodeon" so customers won't see all the "bad news" about the economy. (true story) LOL

                                {"commentId":4155745,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"uvbuyer"}
                                  Reply#43 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:21 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4155778,"authorDomain":"jeremyrfitzpatrick"}

                                  I like Kevin D's idea - except the banks would probably lend as irresponsibly as they have to the people who can't pay for their homes, and we'd be right back in the same situation.

                                  Let them fail.  No company should be too big to fail.  Capitalism contemplates winners and losers.

                                  {"commentId":4155778,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"jeremyrfitzpatrick"}
                                  • 2 votes
                                  Reply#44 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:23 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4155822,"authorDomain":"rjkuchenmeister"}

                                  I don't agree with private jets for anyone but find it amusing that the same people who bash these CEO's do the same thing. We have multi millionaires sitting in those senate seats yet they continue to fly private jets then in turn ask us the taxpayers to fork over more money for their special interests. Lets expose Harry and Nancy too! What about Al Gore? Big house, private jets yet us peasants should give in to his Global Warming scare tactic and fork over money. Unleash your anger at him too! Lets not put a few under the microscope lets hold them all accountable. Both sides of the aisle.

                                  {"commentId":4155822,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"rjkuchenmeister"}
                                  • 2 votes
                                  Reply#45 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:26 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4155835,"authorDomain":"tatia-j"}

                                  I am refuring to the cost of flying the jets for one year, if they hadent how much would the company saved how many JOBS is that.

                                  {"commentId":4155835,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"tatia-j"}
                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#46 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:27 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4155931,"authorDomain":"fasracer"}

                                  Since you have been in avaition and are currently out of work, drop me an e-mail to and lets discuss employment ops. 

                                  {"commentId":4155931,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"fasracer"}
                                    #46.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:32 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4156120,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

                                    Ahhh, don't see that very often on the Vine.  Nice!  ;)

                                    {"commentId":4156120,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
                                      #46.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:42 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":4156723,"authorDomain":"tatia-j"}

                                      Thank you

                                      {"commentId":4156723,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"tatia-j"}
                                        #46.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:16 PM EST
                                        Reply
                                        {"commentId":4155963,"authorDomain":"cymarsden"}

                                        It's the same as going to collect welfare in a Cadillac!

                                        {"commentId":4155963,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"cymarsden"}
                                        • 2 votes
                                        Reply#47 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:33 PM EST
                                        {"commentId":4156366,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

                                        Heaveto, ROFLMAO!  Good one!

                                        {"commentId":4156366,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
                                        • 1 vote
                                        #47.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:56 PM EST
                                        {"commentId":4157448,"authorDomain":"dijastep"}

                                        Now that is funny!  But sad also!

                                        {"commentId":4157448,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"dijastep"}
                                        • 1 vote
                                        #47.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:00 PM EST
                                        {"commentId":4167588,"authorDomain":"gmlarkin"}

                                        Heaveho--you must live in NY state....we've gots lots of that around here....

                                        Escalades in the parking lot of the public services building always warms my heart when I think of where my taxes are going. ;-0

                                        {"commentId":4167588,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"gmlarkin"}
                                          #47.3 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:34 PM EST
                                          Reply
                                          {"commentId":4155964,"authorDomain":"gtrider03"}

                                          “Wagoner and Ford CEO Alan Mulally are required by their companies to fly by private aircraft for security reasons, according to company documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.”

                                          What a bunch of bull. They are CEO’s not the President who’s going to know who they are or even care. They can fly 1st class or coach on a commercial airline or take a train or bus to save on company expenditures.  If the auto industry can afford jets for their CEO’s they don’t need to be asking for a bailout.  They would rather cut salary employee’s pay so they can keep the CEO’s pockets comfortably padded as well as the other jests.  Don’t give them one dime let them fail, file bankruptcy.  I said this before I’ll say it again.

                                           

                                          I’m against any kind of bailout because it will make my taxes go up even higher. But I’m sure the auto bail out will pass just like the Wall Street bailout did.

                                          Before they are given any money they should have to show a better way to structure their company’s policies and follow through with it.

                                          They should be the ones that have to repay the loan they receive and not pass it on to the people.

                                          They should have to show a profit- gain -loss for the past 5 years.

                                          They should have to show salary raises -bonuses for the past 5 years.

                                          They should have to show what all that company owns and who their partners are.

                                          It should be 100% regulated with strict policies already in place before any money is handed over and no back tracking on what the money is to be used for like it is on that 700 billion bailout.

                                          They are forced to apply the borrowed money towards making fuel efficient vehicles only as soon as they get the money.  Regardless what type of vehicle they are making now.

                                          They should have to agree that the top 5 executives will not receive any special bonuses or balloon packages until the loan is paid back in full and that company shows they can operate without any more help. Make it clear that any auto industry that received any government funding they will not receive funding again.   

                                          They should make the vehicles more affordable with lower rates.

                                          If anyone that can not afford a certain vehicle they should be turned down.

                                          Make sure the auto industry doesn’t turn into another AIG by using the money they get for other purposes then what it is intended for.  

                                          {"commentId":4155964,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"gtrider03"}
                                          • 1 vote
                                          Reply#48 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:33 PM EST
                                          {"commentId":4156063,"authorDomain":"fasracer"}

                                          Obviously you have not spent much time in the corporate world.  Most major corporations around the world require their top people to fly corporate jets.   there is nothing new about that at all. 

                                          Most of the info you want is available through corp SEC filings and consolidated tax statements which are public record.

                                          saying yu are going to build a new car that is efficent is wonderful, but it is going to take 2-3 years to get it on the road

                                          {"commentId":4156063,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"fasracer"}
                                            #48.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:39 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":4158565,"authorDomain":"gtrider03"}

                                            Clay No, I’m not from a corporate world and if I were I would not be flaunting the usage of private plans when asking for a bailout.

                                             

                                            You said “Most major corporations around the world require their top people to fly corporate jets.” Why????

                                             

                                            When times are hard especially for companies right now why not show the world your bigger then that and do inside cutbacks like using common sense and take a commercial flight not a rented jet and save the company money.

                                             

                                            You said “Most of the info you want is available through corp SEC filings and consolidated tax statements which are public record.”  True but any company that is wanting a bailout they should present everything in the open, up front portfolio without anyone having to search for that information and how they plan to save their company money.

                                            saying yu are going to build a new car that is efficent is wonderful, but it is going to take 2-3 years to get it on the road.  Doesn’t matter what does matter is they start on it when and if they receive the bailout money and not use the money for anything other then that.

                                            {"commentId":4158565,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"gtrider03"}
                                            • 2 votes
                                            #48.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:05 PM EST
                                            Reply
                                            {"commentId":4156016,"authorDomain":"georgeking91"}

                                            Let me get this straight. Chrysler's response to the jet fiasco was "It is a private matter". These are the same people in front of the sub-committee begging for our money. PRIVATE MATTER???????????  Chrysler needs to GO.  First.

                                            {"commentId":4156016,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"georgeking91"}
                                            • 3 votes
                                            Reply#49 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:36 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":4156018,"authorDomain":"cwilson-2"}

                                            For Security reasons.  That's a load of whoooie.  Only the British royal family should be flying on seperate airplanes because of the royal line.  You don't want Prince Charles and Prince William and Harry on the same flight.  If it went down, then the crown would go to someone else in the blood line.  Not to any of Queen Elizabeth's children or grandchildren.  These automakers sure have a lot of balls.

                                            {"commentId":4156018,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"cwilson-2"}
                                            • 3 votes
                                            Reply#50 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:36 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":4156026,"authorDomain":"Dijeau"}

                                            Ever wonder how many GM cars Boeing buys or leases a year.  How about United Airlines?  I bet they aren't economy cars for their top people.  How many workers were employed to build and maintain those aircraft?  Are they going to be unemployed now also?  When times are good, everyone rides.  When times are bad, everyone cuts back.  If you were the Pilot or other worker getting a "Pink Slip" because of the returned Aircraft, you would have a lot different opinion.  How many of you have been employed by companies that fulfill the perks for the BIG BOYS and have gotten a paycheck from it?

                                            {"commentId":4156026,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"Dijeau"}
                                              Reply#51 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:37 PM EST
                                              {"commentId":4156093,"authorDomain":"davdm1"}

                                              This is part of a much bigger problem and a main reason why these companies are in the fit they're in. The top execs get paid soooo much freakin money, that they have no stake in the future of the company. They are set, they're decendents are set, etc, etc as soon as they sign on board. They don't need to care and they obviously don't care... they're attitude seems to be, "Screw the world, I got mine".

                                              {"commentId":4156093,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"davdm1"}
                                              • 3 votes
                                              Reply#52 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:40 PM EST
                                              {"commentId":4156138,"authorDomain":"collinsw08"}

                                              You are correct!  There is no incentive, they've got theirs and no one is going to take it away so why should they really care.  They are the piviledged ones and in their minds they deserve all the perks. 

                                              {"commentId":4156138,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"collinsw08"}
                                              • 1 vote
                                              #52.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:43 PM EST
                                              {"commentId":4159016,"authorDomain":"billpiech"}

                                              I would like to comment on this.  Bill Gates and his wife have given much back to the community.  So has Tiger Woods and I'm sure there are others.  Being able to help those less fortunate has got to be the greatest feeling in the world.........

                                              {"commentId":4159016,"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915","authorDomain":"billpiech"}
                                              • 1 vote
                                              #52.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:35 PM EST
                                              Reply
                                              Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4 ... 9
                                              {"canLink":false,"threadId":"425062","isPrivate":false}
                                              Leave a Comment:
                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                              {"threadId":"425062","contentId":"2135915"}
                                              Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                              Stop TrackingStop Tracking